Biotech entity
Every one of those 1 sits in a single category, pharma. Of the tracked stories, 1 of 1 also mention EPA, the most common co-covered peer. We currently track 1 Biotech story that mention Wisconsin Senate, all published on March 18, 2026.
Last mentioned: Mar 18, 2026
Entity pulse
Coverage balance Positive coverage leads. Positive coverage exceeds negative coverage by 100 percentage points.
Figures are computed live from our source-verified story record — see our methodology for how impact and sentiment are derived.
Every one of those 1 sits in a single category, pharma. Of the tracked stories, 1 of 1 also mention EPA, the most common co-covered peer. We currently track 1 Biotech story that mention Wisconsin Senate, all published on March 18, 2026. Each carries 2 original sources on average.
Computed from the 1 stories linked to this entity, with beat comparisons drawn from all 18 Biotech stories published in the same date window. Shares are omitted below five stories and comparisons below a twenty-story baseline.
Coverage cohort
Other entities that clear the same relevance threshold in stories also covering Wisconsin Senate. Shared-story counts are live from our verified record — not editorial picks.
Expected Deadline
Anticipated window for the Governor to sign, veto, or partially veto the funding bills.
Transmission to Governor
The legislative package is formally sent to Governor Tony Evers' desk.
Senate Vote
Wisconsin Senate debates and passes the $133 million PFAS package.
The Wisconsin Senate has passed a comprehensive $133 million legislative package aimed at combating per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), commonly known as 'forever chemicals.' The bills now head to Governor Tony Evers' desk, marking a significant state-level intervention in environmental toxicology and public health infrastructure.
Wisconsin Senate is linked from 1 story on this site, each scored at or above our 35% relevance threshold — see how these pages are built.
See something wrong on this page — a misattributed entity, a wrong stat, a broken source link? Report a data issue.
